In my last post, "It's Not the Answer Book", I pondered aloud what the Bible is and isn't. After posting it, I thought, "Why did I feel the need to give my resume with regard to Biblical scholarship?" I've realized there are a couple of reasons. One is that I sometimes see the Bible being misappropriated in its use on social media these days by people who, I think, are aware they have little idea what they're talking about. If I'm going to talk about the Bible, I'd at least like to give people enough evidence to decide whether I'm a comparatively credible source of information. Another is that I love the Bible, and have always considered it worthy of a major investment of my time. So when I call into question its usefulness as an "answer book", I want you to know that it's not because I have a low view of scripture. It is, in fact, because I have a high view of scripture as extremely useful for pointing us towards God and showing us what he is like. I think that going to the Bible to validate our views is exactly backwards, and I am prone to do this just like anyone else. But I guard myself from that by engaging the Bible with people and sources whom I trust to challenge my biases. I try to remember to investigate the matters of immediate importance, rather than seeking validation. So that is the framework from which I write about the Bible, and the God it has inspired me to love.
What if two people were given a photo to look at and asked to describe what they saw? One describes a lonely rock beach with a solitary figure, perhaps searching for something. The other describes a lively sandy beach, perhaps a vacation spot, with people in the water, other sunbathing, and a colorful wall behind. What kind of conversation ensues? Could they possibly be talking about the same thing?
They could if they were looking at different halves of the same picture. But they would never know it. What they thought was an "either/or" dichotomy was a "both/and" reality. Their separate perspectives clouded the whole truth. It's not that one of them had the truth and the other didn't. It's not that they each had their own truth. It's that both of them had a limited perspective on the truth. Here, the photographer (my brother) seems to have captured the full truth. But I wish I had been behind him, because I might have incorporated him into my own version of the photograph.
One of the things I love about God, as I have learned through the lens of scripture to see him, is that he is not only the source of all truth, he IS the Truth. I believe there is objective truth--the reality of all that has ever been and will ever be, material and immaterial, and I believe it originates with God and is contained within the parameters of who he is. He has a complete perspective on every detail--he can see what it looks like from up close and far away, from above and below, from before, during and after. He knows every thought and intention, every atom that moves, every beginning and ending. How he embodies all of this is an absolute mystery, because it is way beyond the scope of human understanding. If I could understand it, he would not be worthy of my devotion and worship. The Bible is one of the ways he peels back the layers and lets me see more of who he is.
When we wield the Bible as a weapon to fight our battles of issue and intellect against others, we take on the role of possessor of truth. I believe Truth exists. I don't possess it. You don't possess it. The Truth possesses us. And that is a call to humility. Each perspective helps inform the others.
There are more thoughts percolating on what the Bible actually is, so stay tuned.
Photo Credit: Dave Decker on Instagram @dsdecker82